Today, the American Humanist Association joined 61 other members of the National Coalition of Public Education in opposing reauthorization of the D.C. private school voucher program.
Read the letter sent to the ranking members of the House Oversight & Government Reform Committee below or download a PDF version with footnotes here.
National Coalition for Public Education
Hon. Jason Chaffetz
House Oversight & Government Reform Committee
2236 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Hon. Elijah Cummings
House Oversight & Government Reform Committee
2230 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
March 7, 2017
RE: NCPE Opposes the Reauthorization of the D.C. School Voucher Program
Dear Chairman Chaffetz and Ranking Member Cummings:
The 62 undersigned organizations write to voice opposition to the reauthorization of the District of Columbia private school voucher program. We oppose this and all private school voucher programs because public funds should be spent on public schools, not private schools. But the D.C. program, in particular, has proven ineffective and unaccountable to taxpayers. Not only have multiple Department of Education (USED) studies concluded that the program has failed to improve educational outcomes for participating students, but two U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports have also identified its repeated management and accountability failures.
We acknowledge that supporters of this program may be able to point to some students who have gone to exemplary schools and seen improvement from the program. But according to government studies and investigative reports, these students are, unfortunately, the exception rather than the rule. Congress should not reauthorize or expand this unsuccessful and poorly managed program.
Our Public Schools Have Great Value, but They Are Undermined by Private School Vouchers
Open and nondiscriminatory in their acceptance of all students, American public schools are a unifying factor among the diverse range of ethnic and religious communities in our society. Public schools are the only schools that must meet the needs of all students. They do not turn children or families away. They serve all children, including those with physical, behavioral health and intellectual disabilities, those who are gifted, and those who have learning differences.
Vouchers undermine this vital function, however, by diverting desperately needed resources away from the public school system to fund the education of a few voucher students—without offering any actual reforms. The government would better serve all children by using these funds to make the public schools stronger.
The D.C. Voucher Program Does Not Improve Academic Achievement
All four of the congressionally mandated USED studies that have analyzed the D.C. voucher program have concluded that it did not significantly improve reading or math achievement. The USED studies further found that the voucher program had no effect on student satisfaction, motivation or engagement, or student views on school safety. D.C. is not an outlier in this area, as recent research on vouchers in Indiana, Louisiana, and Ohio demonstrate that vouchers actually lower the academic achievement of the students who receive them. The studies of the D.C. voucher also indicated that many of the students in the voucher program were less likely to have access to key services such as ESL programs, learning supports, special education supports and services, and counselors than students who were not part of the program. A program that has failed to improve the academic achievement or school experience of the students in the District of Columbia does not warrant reauthorization.
The D.C. Voucher Program Lacks Sufficient Oversight
GAO reports from both 2007 and 2013 document that the D.C. voucher program has repeatedly failed to meet basic and even statutorily required accountability standards. The 2013 report concluded that the administrator of the program has continually failed to ensure the program operated with basic accountability measures and quality controls and even failed to maintain adequate records on its own financial accounting. The interim executive director at that time even admitted that “quality oversight of the program as sort of a dead zone, a blind spot.”
Congress has attempted to address the oversight problems, yet they continue. For example, in its 2007 report, the GAO criticized the D.C. voucher program’s annual directory, saying that the program administrator “did not collect or omitted or incorrectly reported some information that would have helped parents evaluate the quality of participating schools.” The most recent GAO report found that six years later, the program still suffered the same flaw. In a similar vein, the 2007 GAO report found that several schools receiving vouchers lacked valid certificates of occupancy. In response, Congress included a provision in the SOAR Act specifying that private schools accepting vouchers must obtain and maintain one. Nonetheless, in 2013 the GAO reported that nine of the ten schools they investigated still did not meet the certificates of occupancy requirement.
A program with such repeated and serious oversight problems should not be reauthorized.
Many Participating Schools Are of Poor Quality
A special investigation conducted by the Washington Post found that many of the private schools in the program are not quality schools. It described one school that consisted entirely of voucher students as existing in just two classrooms in “a soot-stained storefront” where students used a gymnasium two miles down the road. Another voucher school was operated out of a private converted home with facilities so unkempt that students had to use restrooms in an unaffiliated daycare center downstairs. And yet another school, where 93% of the students had vouchers, used a “learning model known as “Suggestopedia,” an obscure Bulgarian philosophy of learning that stresses learning through music, stretching and meditation.” Congress cannot justify reauthorizing a program that uses federal funds to place D.C. students in such schools.
The D.C. Voucher Program Threatens Civil Rights and Undermines Constitutional Protections
The voucher program strips students of civil rights protections. Despite receiving public funds, the private schools participating in the D.C. voucher program do not abide by federal civil rights laws, do not adhere to religious freedom protections provided to public school students under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and do not face the same public accountability standards that all public schools must meet, including those in Title VI, Title IX, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Students who attend private schools with vouchers are also stripped of their First Amendment, due process, and other constitutional and statutory rights provided to them in public schools. Schools that do not provide students with these basic civil rights protections should not be funded with taxpayer dollars.
The D.C. Voucher Program Does Not Provide Parents Real Choice
Vouchers do not offer a meaningful choice to parents or students. Voucher schools can reject students based on prior academic achievement, economic background, English language ability, or disciplinary history. Also, the D.C. voucher allows religious schools to discriminate against students on the basis of gender. In contrast, public schools serve all students who live in D.C.
Certain groups of D.C. students have less access to voucher schools than others. For example, students with disabilities often cannot find a private school that can, or wants to, serve them: The USED reports show that a significant number of students with disabilities had to reject their voucher or leave their voucher school because the schools failed to offer them needed services that would have been available to them had they remained in a public school.
The D.C. voucher program fails to offer D.C. students better educational resources, greater opportunities for academic achievement, or adequate accountability to taxpayers. For these reasons and more, we oppose the reauthorization and any expansion of the D.C. voucher program.
Thank you for your consideration of our views.
AASA: The School Superintendents Association
African American Ministers In Action
American Association of University Women (AAUW)
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of the District of Columbia
American Federation of School Administrators (AFSA), AFL-CIO
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)
American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO
American Humanist Association American Jewish Committee (AJC)
Americans for Democratic Action Americans for Religious Liberty
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Association of School Business Officials International
Association of Educational Service Agencies
Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty
Center for Inquiry
Central Conference of American Rabbis
Clearinghouse on Women’s Issues
Council for Exceptional Children
Council of Administrators of Special Education
Council of the Great City Schools
Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund
Disciples Justice Action Network
Equal Partners in Faith
Family Equality Council
Feminist Majority Foundation
Freedom From Religion Foundation
Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN)
Hindu American Foundation
Institute for Science and Human Values
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
League of United
Latin American Citizens
Learning Disabilities Association of America
National Alliance of Black School Educators
National Association of Elementary School Principals
National Association of Federally Impacted Schools
National Association of Secondary School Principals
National Association of State Directors of Special Education
National Black Justice Coalition
National Center for Lesbian Rights
National Council of Jewish Women
National Disability Rights Network
National Education Association
National Organization for Women
National Rural Education Advocacy Coalition
National Rural Education Association
National School Boards Association
People For the American Way
School Social Work Association of America
Secular Coalition for America
Southern Poverty Law Center Texas Freedom Network
Union for Reform Judaism
United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries
Women of Reform Judaism