Hnn | The Latest From HNN | Details

Sexual Intelligence: Supreme Court Obsessed with Sex--Healthy Americans Lose Rights

 

Sexual Intelligence: Supreme Court Obsessed with Sex--Healthy Americans Lose Rights

From Sexual Intelligence
June 10, 2009


MARTY KLEIN For a half-century, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has had the right to decide which words and pictures are excluded from the Free Speech guarantees all Americans enjoy. The FCC's criterion for this cruel abridgment of the Bill of Rights is material that involves "sexual and excretory functions."

This sounds clearer than it actually is. For example, do the words "dickhead" and "buttface" refer to sexual or excretory functions (controlling whether you're allowed to watch "South Park" or "The Daily Show")? Are plain buttocks (not the anus, just the cheeks) a sexual organ? (The FCC recently ruled that they are.)

The FCC's attitude, especially under the Bush regime, has been 'when in doubt, throw it out'. And so "Saving Private Ryan" was unavailable to many viewers last Memorial Day, as stations feared punitive fines for airing this testament to the (salty-mouthed) soldiers who died to preserve democratic institutions (like the FCC).

So the FCC is obsessed with sex, seeing it everywhere, and attempting to exclude depictions of or references to it--no matter how indirect or esoteric.

This week the Supreme Court affirmed that it, too, sees sex wherever it looks. First it affirmed the FCC's right to banish and therefore punish the occasional coarse word fleeting across your TV screen--say, Bono exclaiming something is "fucking brilliant" or Paris Hilton noting the difficulty of getting "cow shit out of a Prada purse."

Days later, the Supreme Court challenged a lower court ruling that the half second glimpse of Janet Jackson's breast during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show should not be punished.

In both rulings, the Supreme Court sought to "protect" Americans from "sexual" words or images that would either harm them, offend them, or undermine the country's "morality."

Justice Scalia and colleagues offered absolutely no science to support their fear. Indeed, Scalia conveniently omitted the fact that the rates of sexual violence, divorce, and child molestation have remained stable since 300 million American eyeballs were seared with the horrifying image of the Jackson tit five and a half years ago.

Indeed, Scalia himself warned, in his scathing dissent in the case that de-criminalized gay sodomy (Lawrence v. Texas, 2003), that the majority decision would end the government's ability to legislate based on "morality." His anxiety about what he quaintly calls "the f-word" seems to have separated him from his own beliefs.

The obsession with seeing sex where it doesn't exist isn't limited to media issues.

Author Sally Wendkos Olds reminds us about those who successfully demand that mothers who breastfeed on airplanes or other public places stop or cover up--because breasts are sexual, and immature adults have a right to be "protected" from seeing them.

There are lots of fascinating technical arguments about these FCC cases, which legal writer Mark Kernes explains quite clearly.

But the real question is: why are people like Justice Scalia, Rush Limbaugh, and Bill O'Reilly more concerned about protecting the sensibilities of some people than the Constitution of everybody?


© Marty Klein, Ph.D. (www.SexEd.org).

Marty Klein, Ph.D is the author and publisher of Sexual Intelligence, a monthly electronic newsletter. This column is reprinted from (Issue #112, JUNE 2009) For information about republishing this column, contact the author.
Posted 08:06AM on June 11 2009 by Patrick Connors
Categories: Ezine

American Humanist Association

Happy Friday everyone!

16 hours ago

American Humanist Association

The number of "churchless" Americans is rising! It is now estimated that 38% of...

19 hours ago

American Humanist Association

On this day in 1946, the first images of Earth from outer space were captured!

20 hours ago

American Humanist Association

AHA staffer Matthew Bulger talks about Gamergate. "It’s extremely important th...

22 hours ago

American Humanist Association

Throwback Thursday's Name that Humanist! Can you name the humanist on the Nove...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

Hey! Don't be a.... What's the problem with Dick's Sporting Goods? Deborah Goem...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

This week's Humanist Hour Podcast features George Eighmey on Death with Dignity.

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

WOW! These numbers are wonderful! Thanks for all of the support everyone!

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

AHA Victory in Texas! Schools agree to stop making religious announcements.

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

Jason Heap reviews the new British comedy, Pride! Have you seen this film? Tell...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Gore Vidal’s former assistant, Fabian Bouthillette, has written Part I of his me...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

The Nov/Dec issue of The Humanist is out now, featuring some great interviews wi...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Amy Poehler is creating a show about an agnostic woman who inherits a church. An...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Please welcome the newest addition to the American Humanist Association staff, P...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Woo Hoo! 32 states down, plus DC!

5 days ago