Hnn | HNN Articles

Are Nativity Displays Constitutional?

 

By Monica Miller                                                                         

Although the First Amendment forbids the government from establishing religion, once again this holiday season, cities and counties across the country will be displaying nativity scenes to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ on government property. Nativity scenes (also known as crèches) have no place on government property. Indeed, the Supreme Court has held that stand-alone religious holiday displays violate the Establishment Clause. That much is clear.

Unfortunately, governments can place such displays on their property if there are sufficient “secular holiday symbols” nearby, such as snowmen, Santa Claus, and reindeer.  According to the U.S. Supreme Court, there must be enough of these in the display to detract “from the crèche’s religious message.” The Court justified this rule on an erroneous assumption–that a “reasonable observer” would not perceive a crèche prominently affixed on government property, surrounded only by a few not-exclusively-Christian Christmas decorations, as endorsing religion. Adding “secular” decorations, all of which relate to the holiday surrounding the birth of a religious figure, hardly negates the government’s obvious endorsement of Christianity. 

The Supreme Court first addressed the issue of public holiday displays in 1984 in Lynch v. Donnelly. The Court held that Pawtucket did not violate the Establishment Clause by including a city-owned crèche in a holiday display in a private park. The display also included “a Santa Claus house, reindeer pulling Santa’s sleigh, candy-striped poles, a Christmas tree, carolers, cut-out figures representing such characters as a clown, an elephant, and a teddy bear, hundreds of colored lights,” and a large banner that read “SEASONS GREETINGS.” The Court found that the inclusion of a single religious symbol, the crèche, did not “taint” the entire display.

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor concurred but wrote separately to offer what later became the “endorsement of religion” standard: “What is crucial is that a government practice not have the effect of communicating a message of government endorsement or disapproval of religion.” Justice O’Connor famously recognized that endorsement of religion sends “a message to non-adherents that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored members of the political community.”  

Five years later, the Supreme Court adopted the endorsement test in County of Allegheny v. ACLU of Greater Pittsburgh. This was the second and most recent Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of holiday displays. In Allegheny, two displays were challenged. The first consisted of a crèche display inside a courthouse, sponsored by a Catholic church. The other involved an elaborate display featuring a 45-foot Christmas tree and an 18-foot menorah, placed outside the City-County Building. The Court held that the crèche was unconstitutional but not the menorah.

The Court found that “unlike in Lynch, nothing in the context of the display detracts from the crèche’s religious message.” Because the crèche was situated on the most prominent staircase in the courthouse, no passerby could view it without receiving “an unmistakable message that it supports and promotes the Christian praise to God that is the crèche’s religious message.” A disclaimer sign identifying the private sponsor did not change this conclusion.

Although Santa Claus figures and other Christmas decorations were present elsewhere in the courthouse, there were none on the staircase. In distinguishing the case from Lynch the Court observed: “The Lynch display comprised a series of figures and objects, each group of which had its own focal point.” In contrast, the crèche in Allegheny sat alone in the “main” and “most beautiful part” of the “building that is the seat of county government.”

The menorah presented a “closer constitutional question,” but the majority ultimately concluded it was permissible. Unlike the crèche in Lynch, which was owned by the city, neither Allegheny County nor Pittsburgh owned the crèche or menorah. The Court found relevant the fact that “a Christmas tree and a sign saluting liberty” surrounded the menorah. The Court believed the tree to be a secular symbol, and the sign proclaiming liberty to “diminish the possibility that the tree and the menorah will be interpreted as a dual endorsement of Christianity and Judaism.”

Many governments today add “secular” Christmas decorations to their crèche displays solely to meet the minimal requirements set forth in these cases rather than to genuinely celebrate the “cultural significance” of a national holiday, as in Lynch.

Others have decided they would rather display the crèche alone, ignoring the clear command of Lynch and Allegheny. To get around these cases, they rely on the “open forum” doctrine derived from free speech jurisprudence. The theory is that in a traditional public forum, where private individuals have fundamental free speech rights, a crèche donated by a private individual is private, rather than government speech. Of course, by creating such a forum, the government must remain viewpoint neutral and cannot deny access to other speakers based on the content of their speech. Hence, a humanist cannot be precluded from putting up a display promoting humanism simply because of its message. 

The Appignani Humanist Legal Center has already received multiple complaints about crèches on government property. If you are offended by a crèche (or menorah or other holiday display) on government property, please let us know. If the display includes other “secular” decorations, take note of what they are and where they are. 

Monica Miller is a legal consultant for the Appignani Humanist Legal Center of the American Humanist Association.

blog comments powered by Disqus

American Humanist Association

Only 5 more days until ReAsonCon 2015. Get your tickets today! Visit the link be...

23 hours ago

American Humanist Association

Seculars have been quiet and invisible as a demographic for too long, but Openly...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

Don't miss the upcoming annual BSIC panel discussion entitled “Imagining the Fut...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

We’re featuring new comics this week by Polyp Cartoonist! For more great comics...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

What would Molly Ringwald say about privacy? Should a student attending a privat...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Luis Granados explains why Ayaan Hirsi is wrong about Islamic reform in his revi...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

AHA legal director David Niose, author of Fighting Back the Right: Reclaiming Am...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

This week, AHA staff member Jessica Xiao interviewed Lynn Rothschild, senior sci...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Today is Ask an Atheist Day! Have a question about atheism, humanism, or non-bel...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Could we see an open Humanist in Congress in 2016? It seems Maryland Senator Jam...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

This week on The Humanist Hour #146: A Conversation with Lisa Montoya, Seminary...

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

Mother's Day is right around the corner! If you are shopping for that special la...

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

The world's most and least religious countries.

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

Shortly after we ensure that teachers won't pass out Bibles to their students at...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

Robert Ray, President of Humanists of North Puget Sound, delivered a humanist in...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

Don't miss Kelly Carlin, daughter of atheist comedian George Carlin, at AHA's 74...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

What should the humanist response to terrorism be? Clay Farris Naff has some pro...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

Are you a high school or college student interested in joining us at our 74th an...

8 days ago

American Humanist Association

"Let us give a toast to Christopher Hitchens on what would have been his 66th bi...

8 days ago

American Humanist Association

After a letter from our Appignani Humanist Legal Center, a public school distric...

8 days ago

American Humanist Association

It's time for another episode of the Cartoon History of Humanism!

10 days ago

American Humanist Association

Thank Godfolk It’s Friday! Religious Funnies from around the World!

11 days ago

American Humanist Association

The Secular Coalition for America will hold its annual Lobby Day & Secular Summi...

11 days ago

American Humanist Association

According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll, 52 percent of Americans support allowi...

11 days ago

American Humanist Association

School nurse refuses care for kid who opted out of Pledge. AHA to the rescue!

11 days ago

American Humanist Association

What will the world's religious landscape look like in 2050?

12 days ago