Hnn | HNN Articles

Are Nativity Displays Constitutional?

 

By Monica Miller                                                                         

Although the First Amendment forbids the government from establishing religion, once again this holiday season, cities and counties across the country will be displaying nativity scenes to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ on government property. Nativity scenes (also known as crèches) have no place on government property. Indeed, the Supreme Court has held that stand-alone religious holiday displays violate the Establishment Clause. That much is clear.

Unfortunately, governments can place such displays on their property if there are sufficient “secular holiday symbols” nearby, such as snowmen, Santa Claus, and reindeer.  According to the U.S. Supreme Court, there must be enough of these in the display to detract “from the crèche’s religious message.” The Court justified this rule on an erroneous assumption–that a “reasonable observer” would not perceive a crèche prominently affixed on government property, surrounded only by a few not-exclusively-Christian Christmas decorations, as endorsing religion. Adding “secular” decorations, all of which relate to the holiday surrounding the birth of a religious figure, hardly negates the government’s obvious endorsement of Christianity. 

The Supreme Court first addressed the issue of public holiday displays in 1984 in Lynch v. Donnelly. The Court held that Pawtucket did not violate the Establishment Clause by including a city-owned crèche in a holiday display in a private park. The display also included “a Santa Claus house, reindeer pulling Santa’s sleigh, candy-striped poles, a Christmas tree, carolers, cut-out figures representing such characters as a clown, an elephant, and a teddy bear, hundreds of colored lights,” and a large banner that read “SEASONS GREETINGS.” The Court found that the inclusion of a single religious symbol, the crèche, did not “taint” the entire display.

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor concurred but wrote separately to offer what later became the “endorsement of religion” standard: “What is crucial is that a government practice not have the effect of communicating a message of government endorsement or disapproval of religion.” Justice O’Connor famously recognized that endorsement of religion sends “a message to non-adherents that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored members of the political community.”  

Five years later, the Supreme Court adopted the endorsement test in County of Allegheny v. ACLU of Greater Pittsburgh. This was the second and most recent Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of holiday displays. In Allegheny, two displays were challenged. The first consisted of a crèche display inside a courthouse, sponsored by a Catholic church. The other involved an elaborate display featuring a 45-foot Christmas tree and an 18-foot menorah, placed outside the City-County Building. The Court held that the crèche was unconstitutional but not the menorah.

The Court found that “unlike in Lynch, nothing in the context of the display detracts from the crèche’s religious message.” Because the crèche was situated on the most prominent staircase in the courthouse, no passerby could view it without receiving “an unmistakable message that it supports and promotes the Christian praise to God that is the crèche’s religious message.” A disclaimer sign identifying the private sponsor did not change this conclusion.

Although Santa Claus figures and other Christmas decorations were present elsewhere in the courthouse, there were none on the staircase. In distinguishing the case from Lynch the Court observed: “The Lynch display comprised a series of figures and objects, each group of which had its own focal point.” In contrast, the crèche in Allegheny sat alone in the “main” and “most beautiful part” of the “building that is the seat of county government.”

The menorah presented a “closer constitutional question,” but the majority ultimately concluded it was permissible. Unlike the crèche in Lynch, which was owned by the city, neither Allegheny County nor Pittsburgh owned the crèche or menorah. The Court found relevant the fact that “a Christmas tree and a sign saluting liberty” surrounded the menorah. The Court believed the tree to be a secular symbol, and the sign proclaiming liberty to “diminish the possibility that the tree and the menorah will be interpreted as a dual endorsement of Christianity and Judaism.”

Many governments today add “secular” Christmas decorations to their crèche displays solely to meet the minimal requirements set forth in these cases rather than to genuinely celebrate the “cultural significance” of a national holiday, as in Lynch.

Others have decided they would rather display the crèche alone, ignoring the clear command of Lynch and Allegheny. To get around these cases, they rely on the “open forum” doctrine derived from free speech jurisprudence. The theory is that in a traditional public forum, where private individuals have fundamental free speech rights, a crèche donated by a private individual is private, rather than government speech. Of course, by creating such a forum, the government must remain viewpoint neutral and cannot deny access to other speakers based on the content of their speech. Hence, a humanist cannot be precluded from putting up a display promoting humanism simply because of its message. 

The Appignani Humanist Legal Center has already received multiple complaints about crèches on government property. If you are offended by a crèche (or menorah or other holiday display) on government property, please let us know. If the display includes other “secular” decorations, take note of what they are and where they are. 

Monica Miller is a legal consultant for the Appignani Humanist Legal Center of the American Humanist Association.

blog comments powered by Disqus

American Humanist Association

Fighting Back the Right: Reclaiming America from the Attack on Reason, the new b...

1 hours ago

American Humanist Association

Things that make you go hmmm....

12 hours ago

American Humanist Association

Here is a cool new Kickstarter campaign to create a children's book for non-bel...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

AHA board member Howard Katz is at Skepticon representing! Make sure to stop by...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

December 2nd is Giving Tuesday. This holiday season, while you are buying gifts...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

Hey, It's our favorite science guy! Clay Farris Naff talks with past AHA humanis...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

Who is ready for Skepticon 2014?! If you are attending the event, make sure to s...

2 days ago

American Humanist Association

Today is National Transgender Day of Remembrance. Today we remember transgenders...

2 days ago

American Humanist Association

Today the American Humanist Association’s Appignani Humanist Legal Center sent a...

2 days ago

American Humanist Association

Many people don't believe that a person can be good without a god. What are thos...

2 days ago

American Humanist Association

Yesterday, AHA's David Niose presented his argument that the phrase "under God"...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

A Congressional hearing on religious accommodations in the armed services is hap...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

Today a judge will hear the arguments of Dave Niose, representing the AHA, in a...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

Last week Indra Zuno delivered her secular invocation at the LA County Board mee...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

The United Coalition of Reason is crushing the billboard game with billboards up...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

The debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham was so entertaining and informative, who...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Following on from last week's spectacular launch of 2 CoRs in the beautiful stat...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Will Kirk Cameron save Christmas and Christianity from the evil, putrid creature...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

The secular community seems torn in their opinion of Dan Brown. Although you may...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

What would give Margaret Atwood faith to keep going during a zombie apocalypse?...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

If you have seen Interstellar you will know what Neil is talking about.

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Release date for Fighting Back the Right, from the AHA's David Niose, is just a...

6 days ago