Hnn | HNN Articles

Unelectable Atheists: U.S. States That Prohibit Godless Americans From Holding Public Office

 

By Matthew Bulger

With election season upon us, and a near constant stream of public jabs and rebuttals between incumbents and their challengers, we should focus on something besides the Americans that are running for office. Instead, let’s turn our attention to a rather peculiar set of state laws relating to elections and nonreligious Americans.

It’s well known that there aren’t many open atheists in Congress or in state government, and that atheists aren’t held in high esteem by potential voters. Some question our dedication to what they view as a “Christian nation” while others feel that they can’t relate to a candidate who doesn’t share the same faith as they do.

Whatever the reason, public distrust isn’t the only means by which atheists are discouraged for running from office. In fact, running for a spot in state legislatures as an atheist is outright illegal in some states. Obviously, these laws are trumped by the “No Religious Test Clause” of the United States Constitution, which is found in Article VI, paragraph 3, and states that:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

However, these laws are still on the books and have given atheist candidates trouble in the past. Cecil Bothwell, an atheist who in 2009 won an election for a Asheville, North Carolina city council seat, was almost unseated by local critics who pointed to a provision in North Carolina’s constitution that prohibited nonbelievers from being elected. This provision of the state constitution is similar to provisions in Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. The provisions follow:

Arkansas, Article 19, Section 1:
No person who denies the being of a God shall hold any office in the civil departments of this State, nor be competent to testify as a witness in any Court.

Maryland, Article 37:
That no religious test ought ever to be required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this State, other than a declaration of belief in the existence of God; nor shall the Legislature prescribe any other oath of office than the oath prescribed by this Constitution.

Mississippi, Article 14, Section 265:
No person who denies the existence of a Supreme Being shall hold any office in this state.

North Carolina, Article 6, Section 8
The following persons shall be disqualified for office: Any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God.

South Carolina, Article 17, Section 4:
No person who denies the existence of a Supreme Being shall hold any office under this Constitution.

Tennessee, Article 9, Section 2:
No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state.

Texas, Article 1, Section 4:
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

So, what do you think of these laws? Are they an affront to the secular nature of our local, state, and federal governments, or are they just antiquated but harmless relics from the past? Should there be an active effort to remove these anti-atheist provisions from the respective state constitutions, or should the nonreligious movement just let federal law trump these discriminatory provisions as conflicts arise?

I think that the legislatures of these states have a duty to eventually get around to removing these provisions and any other elements of their state constitutions that institutionalize discrimination. Now might not be the time due to the large number of pressing issues that plague this nation, but the change ought to eventually be made. Atheists, or any other religious minority for that matter, shouldn’t have to go to court after winning an election just so that federal law is upheld and discrimination is rejected. 

Matthew Bulger is the legislative and program assistant for the American Humanist Association.

blog comments powered by Disqus

American Humanist Association

The behavior of Ray Rice is not just one single occurrence that needs to be reme...

2 hours ago

American Humanist Association

What is your opinion on using crowd-funding to raise money for an abortion? Ge...

4 hours ago

American Humanist Association

Is America's Army becoming God's Army? From bible distribution to requiring the...

6 hours ago

American Humanist Association

Monica Miller, attorney for AHA's Appignani Humanist Legal Center, appeared live...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

Communications Associate, Merrill Miller, reports on the variety of reactions we...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

Already, many students have taken a stand by sitting out the Pledge of Allegianc...

1 days ago

American Humanist Association

Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller had harsh words for the AHA this week in covering...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Great article in the Huffington Post from Michael LaMasa discussing the ever-blu...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

What would you say to someone who is afraid to come out as an atheist in fear of...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Episode Ten of the Cartoon History of Humanism is now out on thehumanist.com!...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Who is worried about the militarization of police? I am! Get TheHumanist.com by...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Earlier this week, The Daily Caller, a website run by Tucker Carlson, ran an obn...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Where do you think Humanists should stand on animal rights?

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

This morning Roy Speckhardt spoke with Newsmax about AHA's "Dont Say The Pledge"...

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

Have you or your child experienced discrimination for not saying the pledge? We...

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

Tucker Carlson's web site covers the AHA's Don't Say the Pledge campaign, and it...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

With all that is going on surrounding our "Don't say the Pledge" campaign, this...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

Why is religion in video games so different from religion in the real world? Jas...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

In his Article from the Religious News Service, Brian Pellot tells us why he sto...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

Attention DC Metro Area Humanists! Today from 12 pm - 1 pm, the Secular Coalitio...

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

Here is an interesting info-graph representing the recent Pledge of Allegiance S...

7 days ago