Hnn | HNN Articles

Unelectable Atheists: U.S. States That Prohibit Godless Americans From Holding Public Office

 

By Matthew Bulger

With election season upon us, and a near constant stream of public jabs and rebuttals between incumbents and their challengers, we should focus on something besides the Americans that are running for office. Instead, let’s turn our attention to a rather peculiar set of state laws relating to elections and nonreligious Americans.

It’s well known that there aren’t many open atheists in Congress or in state government, and that atheists aren’t held in high esteem by potential voters. Some question our dedication to what they view as a “Christian nation” while others feel that they can’t relate to a candidate who doesn’t share the same faith as they do.

Whatever the reason, public distrust isn’t the only means by which atheists are discouraged for running from office. In fact, running for a spot in state legislatures as an atheist is outright illegal in some states. Obviously, these laws are trumped by the “No Religious Test Clause” of the United States Constitution, which is found in Article VI, paragraph 3, and states that:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

However, these laws are still on the books and have given atheist candidates trouble in the past. Cecil Bothwell, an atheist who in 2009 won an election for a Asheville, North Carolina city council seat, was almost unseated by local critics who pointed to a provision in North Carolina’s constitution that prohibited nonbelievers from being elected. This provision of the state constitution is similar to provisions in Arkansas, Maryland, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. The provisions follow:

Arkansas, Article 19, Section 1:
No person who denies the being of a God shall hold any office in the civil departments of this State, nor be competent to testify as a witness in any Court.

Maryland, Article 37:
That no religious test ought ever to be required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this State, other than a declaration of belief in the existence of God; nor shall the Legislature prescribe any other oath of office than the oath prescribed by this Constitution.

Mississippi, Article 14, Section 265:
No person who denies the existence of a Supreme Being shall hold any office in this state.

North Carolina, Article 6, Section 8
The following persons shall be disqualified for office: Any person who shall deny the being of Almighty God.

South Carolina, Article 17, Section 4:
No person who denies the existence of a Supreme Being shall hold any office under this Constitution.

Tennessee, Article 9, Section 2:
No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state.

Texas, Article 1, Section 4:
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.

So, what do you think of these laws? Are they an affront to the secular nature of our local, state, and federal governments, or are they just antiquated but harmless relics from the past? Should there be an active effort to remove these anti-atheist provisions from the respective state constitutions, or should the nonreligious movement just let federal law trump these discriminatory provisions as conflicts arise?

I think that the legislatures of these states have a duty to eventually get around to removing these provisions and any other elements of their state constitutions that institutionalize discrimination. Now might not be the time due to the large number of pressing issues that plague this nation, but the change ought to eventually be made. Atheists, or any other religious minority for that matter, shouldn’t have to go to court after winning an election just so that federal law is upheld and discrimination is rejected. 

Matthew Bulger is the legislative and program assistant for the American Humanist Association.

blog comments powered by Disqus

American Humanist Association

The Humanist Press is proud to announce the release of its latest book, Belief a...

9 hours ago

American Humanist Association

Clay Farris Naff sat down with Ryan Bell, the former senior pastor at the Hollyw...

12 hours ago

American Humanist Association

The American Humanist Association expresses shock and sorrow over another atheis...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

Do you ever feel pressured to participate in religious practices simply because...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

Did Jesus have long hair? Nah. Was he nailed to a cross? Most likely not. The b...

3 days ago

American Humanist Association

Check out the latest trends in Religious Restrictions and Hostilities from the P...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Well, this is cool! What if US dollar notes were redesigned to honor science, ra...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

Another great step for humanism! Greg Epstein, Humanist Chaplain at Harvard, has...

4 days ago

American Humanist Association

A few days ago, the AHA sent letters to newly elected members of Congress, askin...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

According to Larry King, "I don't believe that I'm going anywhere. I'm not relig...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

AHA's Merrill Miller reviews the new documentary "She's Beautiful When She's Ang...

5 days ago

American Humanist Association

Time for another humanist question. Why do humanists/atheists still spell god wi...

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

The American Humanist Association has sent letters to newly elected members of C...

6 days ago

American Humanist Association

Would you go to Mars knowing you would not return?

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

BREAKING NEWS!! ATHEIST comedian is running for California state senate!!

7 days ago

American Humanist Association

Last week AHA's Roy Speckhardt and Maggie Ardiente were invited to attend the sw...

8 days ago

American Humanist Association

AHA's Pledge Boycott is going strong, as more and more kids and families are sit...

8 days ago

American Humanist Association

AHA's David Niose was on the Alan Colmes radio show last night discussing the "u...

9 days ago

American Humanist Association

It appears that the AHA is now considered one of the top five dangerous enemies...

10 days ago

American Humanist Association

Have humanist questions? Ask a humanist! The link below will take you to the one...

10 days ago

American Humanist Association

The American Humanist Association has been nominated by the Reddit community to...

10 days ago

American Humanist Association

When pastor Ryan Bell decided to spend a year as an atheist, he had no idea how...

11 days ago

American Humanist Association

AHA Legal Director David Niose will be on the Alan Colmes Show (Fox News Radio)...

11 days ago